California

California has achieved five of six pillars of rape kit reform. To reach comprehensive rape kit reform, the state must mandate the testing of previously untested kits.

Reform Status
Some Reform
Testing Status
In-Process, Locally
Untested Kits
Now 13929*
Then Unknown**

Pillar Count

5/6 Pillars
California has achieved five of six pillars of rape kit reform. To reach comprehensive rape kit reform, the state must mandate the testing of previously untested kits.
Statewide Inventory

Yes, the state carried out a one-time inventory.

  • Is the inventory recurring? No
  • Are law enforcement agencies and/or labs required to participate in the inventory? Yes
  • Does the law require to document the date of when each kit was collected? Yes
  • Does the law require a reason to be given as to why the kit was not submitted to a crime lab for testing? Yes
  • Does the law require untested kits to be counted? Yes
Test Backlogged Kits

No, the state has not committed to testing its backlogged kits.

  • Does the law require law enforcement to submit all untested kits, including those past the statute of limitation, within a certain deadline? n/a
  • Does the law set a deadline for the crime laboratory to complete analysis once a kit has been submitted to the lab? n/a
  • Does the law require kits past the statute of limitations to be sent in for testing? n/a
  • Does the law allow public crime labs to outsource unsubmitted kits? n/a
Test New Kits

Yes, all newly collected kits are being tested.

  • According to the law, how much time after a rape kit examination do hospitals have to notify law enforcement that a kit is ready to be picked up? Not specified
  • According to the law, after being notified, within what time frame is law enforcement required to pick up the kit? Not specified
  • According to the law, after picking the kit up, within what time frame is law enforcement required to submit the kit to the lab? 20 Days
  • According to the law, after receiving the kit, within what time frame is the lab required to test the kit? 120 Days
  • Does the law allow crime labs to outsource kits for testing if they are unable to meet the deadline? Yes
Implement Tracking System

Yes, tracking system in use.

  • Does the law state that the tracking system should track initial collection at hospital, inventory and storage by law enforcement, and testing and storage by state labs? No
  • Does the law state that the tracking system should track if kit a has been destroyed? No
  • Does the law allow all agencies who participate in the tracking system to update the status of a kit? No
  • Does the law state that the tracking system should have a victim portal? Yes
  • Does the law require law enforcement, labs, and hospitals to participate in the tracking system? No
  • Does the law state that all previously untested kits should be entered into the system? No
Victim's Right To Know

Yes, the state has granted victims the right to notice and be informed on the status of their kit.

  • Do victims have the right to receive information of the location, testing date, and testing results of their kit? Yes
  • Do victims have the right to be informed when there is any change in the status of their case? No
  • Do victims have the right to receive notification before destruction of their kit? Yes
  • Are victims granted further preservation of the kit or its probative contents? No
  • Are victims provided with the contact information for the designated liaison(s) at the corresponding law enforcement agency at the time that a kit is collected? No
  • Do victims have the right to receive a physical document identifying their rights under law? Yes
Fund Reform

Yes, the state has allocated one-time funding.

See state reform timeline below.

Take Action Today to Bring Further Rape Kit Reform to California

State Reform Timeline

2024
Funding
$4,496,599 awarded in California

In 2024, the U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) awarded the City of Fresno nearly $2 million to submit additional SAKs for testing and the City of San Jose $2.5 million to inventory partially tested sexual assault kits, address gaps from the FY2021 SAKI project, and enhance investigative capacity for cold cases.

2023
Funding
$1,500,000 awarded to the Riverside County District Attorney's Office

In 2023, the U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) awarded the Riverside County District Attorney’s Office $1,500,000 to prioritize cases with suspect DNA, submit DNA for timely analysis, and successfully investigate and prosecute these cases.

Funding
$2,500,000 awarded to Kern County

In 2023, the U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) awarded Kern County $2,500,000 to test 750 untested kits possessed by the Kern County Sheriff’s Office.

Funding
$2,500,000 awarded to Ventura County

In 2023, the U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) awarded Ventura County $2,500,000 to investigate cold cases.

News Article
340 untested kits estimated in Sacramento

According to a new city audit, the Sacramento Police Department has an estimated 340 untested rape kits collected prior to 2016, and has not told California’s Department of Justice — a violation of state law. The audit found that the Police Department does not count untested kits in its possession, but all 25 kits collected after 2016 have been tested.

Bill: Enacted
SB464 enacted in California

In 2023, legislators in California enacted SB464. This bill requires all law enforcement agencies, medical facilities, crime laboratories, and any other facilities that receive, maintain, store, or preserve sexual assault evidence kits to conduct an audit of all untested sexual assault evidence kits in their possession. With this new inventory, we will have a better understanding of the extend of the backlog in the state.

Bill: Failed
AB1368 failed in California

In 2023, legislators in California introduced AB1368. This bill would have mandated all the backlogged kits collected before 1/1/16 be submitted to a crime lab on or before January 31, 2025. The lab would have been required to process the kits no later than January 31, 2026. This bill failed.

2022
Bill: Enacted
SB916 enacted in California

California enacted SB916 which would make survivors’ access to the state tracking system, SAFE-T, clear in law.  The bill also requires the card law enforcement must give survivors to include a statement that a court may not imprison or otherwise confine or place in custody a victim of sexual assault or domestic violence for refusing to testify.

2021
Bill: Enacted
California enacted SB215

In 2021, California enacted SB215, which required the addition of a survivor portal to the state’s rape kit tracking system, SAFE-T. Through this, survivors would receive information about the status and location of their kits, anonymously and on their own terms. 

Funding
$4 million appropriated in California

SB129 was enacted in 2021, appropriating $4 million under the Sexual Assault Evidence Submission Grant Program for local law enforcement to submit rape kits to the lab for testing. 

Bill: Failed
AB18 failed in California

AB18 would have mandated law enforcement agencies to submit all the backlogged kits from before 2016 to a crime lab by January 31, 2023. The bill also would have required the labs to test all the kits by January 31, 2024. This bill failed to pass.

Funding
$1,000,000 awarded to City of Fresno

In 2021, the U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) awarded the City of Fresno $1,000,000 to address lawfully owed DNA under SAKI.

Funding
$2,498,907 awarded to Ventura County

In 2021, the U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) awarded Ventura County $2,498,907 to assist in testing approximately 1,000 sexual assault kits and to form a multidisciplinary working group to develop policies for inventorying, prioritizing, and testing all unsubmitted kits.

Funding
$1,425,000 awarded to City of San Jose

In 2021, the U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) awarded the City of San Jose $1,425,000 to submit approximately 655 sexual assault kits (SAKs) for DNA testing, and to improve methodology for data collection, tracking, and sustainable management of rape kits.

2020
Report
California AG released inventory report: 13,929 untested kits found

In April 2020, the California attorney general released the one-time statewide audit mandated by AB3118. The law clearly stated that each law enforcement agency, medical facility, lab, and any other facility that receives, maintains, stores, or preserves rape kits should conduct an audit of all untested rape kits in their possession and participate in the statewide audit. However, the report showed that only 149 police agencies and crime labs participated in the audit. There are 690 police agencies in the state. The report also said that no medical facilities provided information for the audit.

Bill: Failed
AB2481 failed in California

In February 2020, California legislators introduced AB2481, a bill that would require all kits received by law enforcement agencies before January 2016 to be submitted and tested in a crime laboratory by January 31, 2022. Read our testimony in support of the bill. This bill failed to pass.

Funding
$2,186,109 awarded to City of Fresno

In 2020, the U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) awarded the City of Fresno $2,186,109 to continue investigating cold case sexual assaults that were identified during previous SAKI awards, to identify partially tested SAKs, and to submit those for DNA testing, along with secondary evidence.

2019
Bill: Failed
AB358 failed in California

AB358 would have required the California Department of Justice to modify the existing statewide rape kit tracking system to allow survivors of sexual assault to check the status of their kits anonymously. The bill would have also required all law enforcement agencies to enter information about the outcome of each sexual assault case into the Combined DNA Index System Hit Outcome Project. This bill failed to pass.

Bill: Failed
AB1496 failed in California

AB1496 would have mandated law enforcement agencies to submit kits for testing within 20 days, and crime labs to test the kits within 120 days. The bill also would have required law enforcement agencies to send all rape kits collected before January 1, 2020 to a crime lab within six months, and for those kits to be tested within 120 days. This bill failed to pass.

Other
Joyful Heart testified on backlog

In 2019, Joyful Heart testified in front of the Joint Legislative Audit Committee on the state of the rape kit backlog, and California’s need to adopt further reforms. Read our testimony.

Bill: Enacted
California enacted SB22

In October 2019, Governor Gavin Newsom signed SB22, mandating law enforcement to submit rape kits for testing within 20 days, and crime labs to test the evidence within 120 days. Previous law merely encouraged the timely submission and testing of kits. Read our written and oral testimonies in support of the bill.

2018
Bill: Enacted
California enacted AB3118

In 2018, California enacted AB3118, which required medical facilities, law enforcement agencies, and crime laboratories to conduct an audit of untested rape kits in their possession and report certain data to the California Department of Justice by July 2019.

Inventory
California found 13,615 backlogged kits

The same year, Joyful Heart determined that there were 13,615 untested kits, based on a national grant funding report and The Accountability Project.

Bill: Failed
SB1449 vetoed in California

SB1449 would have required law enforcement to submit rape kits to crime labs for testing within 20 days of collection, and crime labs to test kits within 120 days of receipt. The bill passed the California legislature unanimously, but was vetoed by Governor Jerry Brown.

Funding
State budget included kit funding

The 2018 state budget included $1 million to conduct an inventory and $6.5 million to test backlogged kits.

Funding
$1,000,000 awarded to City of Fresno

In 2018, the U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) awarded the City of Fresno $1,000,000 to create a Sexual Assault Cold Case Unit to investigate more than 350 sexual assault kits, to hire new staff to investigate these cold cases, and to move them through the criminal justice system to prosecution.

2017
Bill: Enacted
California enacted AB41

AB41 requires law enforcement agencies and forensic labs to use the California Department of Justice (CAL DOJ) SAFE-T evidence system to maintain and update information about the location and testing status of all newly collected rape kits. Additionally, the bill requires CAL DOJ to submit an annual report to the legislature summarizing all rape kit data collected within the SAFE-T system the previous year.

Bill: Enacted
California enacted AB1312

AB1312 includes provisions strengthening survivors’ rights to notice regarding the location and status of their kits. It also prohibits law enforcement agencies from destroying rape kits for at least 20 years.

Bill: Enacted
California enacted AB280

AB280 enables citizens to donate money to test rape kits when filing their personal income taxes.

2016
Funding
$1,864,651 awarded to Orange County

In 2016, the U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) awarded Orange County $1,864,651 to inventory, submit, and test approximately 3,580 SAKs, and to create a multidisciplinary community response team and develop an automated tracking system.

Bill: Enacted
AB2499 enacted in California

In 2016, California enacted AB2499 that requires the California Department of Justice (CAL DOJ) to establish a process for victims to request information about the location and status of their rape kits by July 2018.

2014
Bill: Enacted
California enacted AB1517

In 2014, California enacted AB1517, which encourages law enforcement agencies to submit newly collected rape kits for testing within 20 days of being booked into evidence, and instructs the crime lab to process rape kit evidence as soon as possible, but no later than 120 days after receiving it. It also requires law enforcement agencies to inform survivors, whether or not the identity of the perpetrator is known, if the law enforcement agency does not analyze the DNA evidence within certain time limits.

2003
Bill: Enacted
California enacted AB898

In 2003, California enacted AB898, granting survivors the right to be informed whether a DNA profile was obtained from testing their rape kit, whether the profile was uploaded into the DNA database, and whether the DNA profile matched another profile in the database. Additionally, survivors have the right to know if law enforcement decides not to test a rape kit within established time limits, and must be notified 60 days prior if law enforcement intends to destroy or dispose of such evidence. Survivors are also granted the right to designate a sexual assault victim advocate to receive any of the above information.

Accountability

We have issued public records requests, through the Freedom of Information Act, to the following jurisdictions in California to discover whether they possess any untested rape kits.
Target
Request Year
Untested kits discovered
Information received
2020
215
2014
2873
2020
754
2020
427
2017
607
2020
39
2020
2
2020
144
2020
1547
2017
19
2017
167
2020
94
2020
28
2020
202
2020
235
2020
88
2020
60
2020
90
Incomplete information received
2017
Unknown
2017
Unknown
2015
Unknown
2017
Unknown
2017
1657
2020
18
2020
13
2015
456
2020
378
2017
Unknown
Request Denied
2015
561
Request In-progress